Reports
State and Local Educational Agencies’ Use of Digital Wallet-Related Technologies and Services
Tennessee Department of Education’s Administration and Oversight of Emergency Assistance to Nonpublic Schools Grant Funds
Yukon-Koyukuk School District’s Use of Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Funds (Alaska)
Linn-Mar Community School District’s Use of Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Grant Funds (Iowa)
Lower Kuskokwim School District’s Use of Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Funds (Alaska)
Southeast Polk Community School District’s Use of Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Grant Funds (Iowa)
Matanuska-Susitna Borough School District’s Use of Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Funds (Alaska)
Des Moines Independent Community School District’s Use of Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Grant Funds
Florida Department of Education’s Administration and Oversight of Emergency Assistance to Nonpublic Schools Grant Funds
Anchorage School District’s Use of Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Grant Funds (Alaska)
Federal Student Aid’s Performance Measures and Indicators for Returning Borrowers to Repayment
Burlington Community School District’s Use of Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Grant Funds (Iowa)
Wisconsin’s Administration and Oversight of the Emergency Assistance to Non-Public Schools Grant Funds
Determine whether the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction designed and implemented (1) application processes that adequately assessed nonpublic schools' eligibility for EANS-funded services or assistance and complied with other applicable requirements and (2) oversight processes to ensure that EANS-funded services or assistance were used for allowable purposes.
Illinois’ Oversight of Local Educational Agency ARP ESSER Plans and Spending
U.S. Department of Education’s Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund Audit Resolution Activities
Kentucky’s Oversight of Local Educational Agency ARP ESSER Plans and Spending
Washington’s Oversight of Local Educational Agency ARP ESSER Plans and Spending
Federal Student Aid’s Use of Pandemic Assistance Student Aid Administration Funds
Federal Student Aid’s Processes for Waiving Return of Title IV Requirements, Cancelling Borrowers’ Obligation to Repay Direct Loans, and Excluding Pell Grants from Federal Pell Lifetime Usage
University of Cincinnati’s Use of Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund Student Aid and Institutional Grants
The Department’s Use of Pandemic Assistance Program Administration Funds
Allocation of ESSER I Funds at Selected Local Educational Agencies
Michigan’s Administration of the Governor’s Emergency Education Relief Fund
Oklahoma’s Administration of the Governor’s Emergency Education Relief Fund Grant
Duplicate Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund Grant Awards
The Office of Postsecondary Education’s Oversight of Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund Grants
Missouri’s Administration of the Governor’s Emergency Education Relief Fund Grant
The Department’s Implementation of CARES Act Flexibilities to TEACH Grant Service Obligations
Review of State Plans for Use of Governor’s Emergency Education Relief Funds
Remington College’s Use of Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund Student Aid and Institutional Grants
Lincoln College of Technology’s Use of Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund Student Aid and Institutional Grants
Inconsistent Grantee and Subgrantee Reporting of Education Stabilization Fund Subprograms in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse
Fraud Reporting Requirements for Federal Program Participants and Auditors
Federal Student Aid’s Suspension of Involuntary Collection in Response to the Coronavirus Pandemic
Risk of Closed Institutions of Higher Education Receiving Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund Grants
Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund Reporting Requirements
Assessment of the Department’s Reconstitution Plans Following COVID-19
Challenges for Consideration in Implementing and Overseeing the CARES Act
Audit of Data Quality in Selected in USAID PEPFAR Programs in Africa
This audit will look at the quality of data reported in selected President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) programs to determine if weaknesses exist that may lead to inaccurate results reporting. The objectives of this audit are to assess the extent to which USAID has: (1) designed and implemented internal controls over collecting, verifying, and reporting PEPFAR data; and (2) identified and mitigated the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on its internal controls over PEPFAR data quality.
Oversight of Overseas Contingency Operations
As required by section 8L of the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended, the Inspectors General for the Department of Defense, Department of State, and USAID work together to report quarterly to Congress on every overseas contingency operation’s progress and corresponding oversight activities. Starting in the second quarter of fiscal year 2020, these quarterly reports include reporting on the COVID-19 outbreaks in Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq, and the Philippines, as well as the U.S. government response to them.
Audit of USAID’s Branding and Marking Requirements
USAID’s branding and marking efforts enhance the visibility and value of U.S. foreign assistance and are intended to inform beneficiaries that aid comes from the American people. Unfortunately, according to the Agency, beneficiaries of the billions of dollars of foreign assistance provided by the United States every year often have little to no awareness that the aid they receive is provided by the American people. The objectives of this audit are to determine the extent to which USAID: (1) has policies and procedures to ensure compliance with statutory branding and marking requirements and (2) provided information and oversight to ensure implementers complied with branding and marking requirements. Given particular interest from Congress amid the ongoing pandemic, this audit will consider the impact of COVID-19 under both objectives as appropriate.
Audit of Local Partner Participation Initiatives in USAID’s PEPFAR Programs in Africa
The Office of the U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator and Health Diplomacy (OGAC) has established a goal of 70 percent local partner participation in President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) programs by 2020. Included in the definition of local partner participation is government-to-government assistance, which is especially risky in Africa given the levels of political corruption in countries with the greatest HIV prevalence. The objectives of this audit are to: (1) describe the extent to which USAID’s PEPFAR budgets are on track to meet the goal for local partner funding; (2) assess to what extent USAID’s agency-wide strategy has prepared the agency to increase PEPFAR funding to local partners while addressing risks; and (3) assess to what extent selected USAID missions in Africa followed agency guidance designed to achieve the goal for PEPFAR local partner funding while addressing risks. The audit also explores topics related to the possible effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on USAID’s ability to reach the OGAC target and the extent to which USAID has identified financial and programmatic risks emanating from the pandemic.