Reports
A Review of Pandemic Relief Funding and How It Was Used In Six U.S. Communities: Marion County, Georgia
Semiannual Report to Congress: April 1, 2024 - September 30, 2024
A Review of Pandemic Relief Funding and How It Was Used In Six U.S. Communities: Sheridan County, Nebraska
A Review of Pandemic Relief Funding and How It Was Used In Six U.S. Communities: Coeur d’Alene, Idaho
A Review of Pandemic Relief Funding and How It Was Used In Six U.S. Communities: Springfield, Massachusetts
Why Unemployment Insurance Fraud Surged During the Pandemic
Pandemic Relief Experiences: A Focus on Six Communities
Agile Oversight in a Time of Crisis: Lessons Learned and Best Practices in Conducting Oversight during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Semiannual Report to Congress: April 1, 2023 - September 30, 2023
Key Insights: Contracts and Grants Workforce Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic
Review of Personnel Shortages in Federal Health Care Programs During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Identity Fraud Victim Redress Processes and Systems
Tracking Pandemic Relief Funds that Went to Local Communities Reveals Persistent Data Gaps and Data Reliability Issues
Semiannual Report to Congress: October 1, 2022 - March 31, 2023
FRAUD ALERT FOLLOW-UP: Improved Sharing of Death Records and Use of the Do Not Pay System Would Strengthen Program Integrity and Better Protect the Public
FRAUD ALERT: PRAC Identifies $5.4 Billion in Potentially Fraudulent Pandemic Loans Obtained Using Over 69,000 Questionable Social Security Numbers
Semiannual Report to Congress: April 1, 2022 - September 30, 2022
Insights on Telehealth Use and Program Integrity Risks Across Selected Health Care Programs During the Pandemic
Risk Advisory – Potential Identity or Other Fraud in SBA Pandemic Relief Programs
Key Insights: Identity Fraud Reduction and Redress in Pandemic Response Programs
Semiannual Report to Congress: October 1, 2021 - March 31, 2022
BEST PRACTICES AND LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE ADMINISTRATION OF PANDEMIC RELATED UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PROGRAMS
Small Business Administration Paycheck Protection Program Phase III Fraud Controls
Key Insights: State Pandemic Unemployment Insurance Programs
Semiannual Report to Congress: April 1, 2021 - September 30, 2021
Increasing Transparency into COVID-19 Spending
Lessons Learned in Oversight of Pandemic Relief Funds
Observations: Fiscal Year 2020 COVID-19 Federal Contracting
COVID-19 Pandemic Impact - Select Case Studies
Federal agencies were allocated more than $5 trillion in pandemic response funding to be disbursed to the public and to state and local governments, where a state or local government could have received pandemic response funds from multiple federal programs to improve the overall pandemic response in their communities. Access to information about the total amount of funds received, the purpose of those funds, and the progress made toward achieving the program goals and objectives is not always centralized and can be difficult for the public to track down or may not even be available to the public. The PRAC will conduct impact case studies at 6 different locations and seek to identify the federal pandemic response funds provided to the 6 locations and the purpose of those funds, and to determine if the federal program spending aligned with the intended goals and objectives. The 6 locations identified for this project include: Springfield, Massachusetts; Coeur d’Alene, Idaho; Marion County, Georgia; Sheridan County, Nebraska; White Earth Indian Nation, Minnesota; and Jicarilla Apache Nation, New Mexico.
Transparency in Pandemic-related Federal Spending: Report of Alignment and Gaps
Key Insights: COVID-19 in Correctional and Detention Facilities
Semiannual Report to Congress: October 1, 2020 - March 31, 2021
Update: Top Challenges in Pandemic Relief and Response
Federal COVID-19 Testing Report: Data Insights from Six Federal Health Care Programs
Transparency in Pandemic-Related Federal Spending: Report of Alignment and Gaps
Agile Toolkit
Semiannual Report to Congress: April 1, 2020 - September 30, 2020
Evaluation of DIA’s Utilization of Reserve Intelligence Capabilities
The Defense Intelligence Agency Office of the Inspector General initiated an evaluation of the Agency's use of Reserve military intelligence capabilities across the Defense Intelligence Enterprise. Our objective is to assess the effectiveness of Agency’s use of Reserve military intelligence forces for the delivery and integration of Reserve capabilities across the Defense Intelligence Enterprise in peacetime and during crisis and contingency operations. Through this evaluation effort, we will examine the use of Reserve military intelligence capabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Evaluation of DIA’s Management of the DoD's All-Source Analyst Professional Certification Program
In response to the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security's initiative to professionalize the analysis workforce within the Department of Defense (DoD), the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) Office of the Inspector General initiated an evaluation to assess the Agency's effectiveness in serving as the All-Source Analyst Professional Certification Program management lead. We will assess the effectiveness of the DIA’s efforts to administer, implement, and oversee the program in accordance with DoD, Intelligence Community, Agency, and national accreditation policies and standards. As a part of this evaluation effort, we will also examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on DIA's ability to provide the DoD analysis workforce with continuous opportunities to attain the Certified Defense All-Source Analyst-I professional credential.
Evaluation of DIA’s Implementation of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act
In accordance with the CARES Act, Section 3610, “Federal Contractor Authority,” March 27, 2020 we will evaluate DIA’s implementation of Section 3610. Our objective is to determine whether DIA’s contractor reimbursements were appropriate and governed by policies and procedures that met the Act’s requirements.