Reports
Search reports, investigative results, and agency plansShowing 31 - 40 of 188 results
Department of Education OIG
Yukon-Koyukuk School District’s Use of Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Funds (Alaska)
We performed this review to determine whether the Yukon-Koyukuk School District’s (Alaska) expended Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) grant funds for allowable purposes in accordance with applicable requirements. We determined that all of the ESSER expenditures we reviewed for the Yukon-Koyukuk School District (Yukon-Koyukuk) were allowable. However, we found that Yukon-Koyukuk did not comply with key competitive procurement process or documentation requirements when procuring the goods or services associated with three (38 percent) of eight non-personnel expenditures...
Department of Education OIG
Clark County School District's Allowable Use of ESSER Grant Funds (Nevada)
Determine whether Clark County School District expended American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) grant funds for allowable purposes in accordance with applicable requirements.
Department of the Treasury OIG
Desk Review of the State of Georgia’s Use of Coronavirus Relief Fund Proceeds
Department of Education OIG
Nye County School District's Allowable Use of ESSER Grant Funds (Nevada)
Determine whether Nye County School District expended American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) grant funds for allowable purposes in accordance with applicable requirements.
Department of Education OIG
Linn-Mar Community School District’s Use of Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Grant Funds (Iowa)
We performed this review to determine whether Linn-Mar Community School District (Iowa) expended Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) grant funds for allowable purposes in accordance with applicable requirements. We determined that all 20 (100 percent) ESSER expenditures that we reviewed for Linn-Mar were allowable. However, we found that Linn-Mar did not comply with key competitive procurement process or documentation requirements when procuring the goods or services associated with 6 (40 percent) of the 15 non-personnel expenditures, totaling $228,510 (49 percent) of the...